[PATCH] nvme: Acknowledge completion queue on each iteration
From: Sinan Kaya <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-19 10:37:30
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-nvme, lkml
On 7/19/2017 5:20 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
quoted
Code is moving the completion queue doorbell after processing all completed events and sending callbacks to the block layer on each iteration. This is causing a performance drop when a lot of jobs are queued towards the HW. Move the completion queue doorbell on each loop instead and allow new jobs to be queued by the HW. Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <redacted> --- drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c index d10d2f2..33d9b5b 100644 --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c@@ -810,13 +810,12 @@ static void nvme_process_cq(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq) while (nvme_read_cqe(nvmeq, &cqe)) { nvme_handle_cqe(nvmeq, &cqe); + nvme_ring_cq_doorbell(nvmeq); consumed++; } - if (consumed) { - nvme_ring_cq_doorbell(nvmeq); + if (consumed) nvmeq->cqe_seen = 1; - } }Agree with Keith that this is definitely not the way to go, it adds mmio operations in the hot path with very little gain (if at all).
Understood, different architectures might have different latency accessing the HW registers. It might be expansive on some platform like you indicated and this change would make it worse. I'm doing a self NACK as well. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.