? 2017?7?7? GMT+08:00 ??5:18:38, Maxime Ripard [off-list ref] ??:

On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 07:13:30AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:

quoted

? 2017?7?7? GMT+08:00 ??4:50:30, Maxime Ripard

[off-list ref] ??:

quoted

quoted

On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 10:28:22PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:

quoted

 	SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN(B, 0),
 		  SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"),
 		  SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x1, "gpio_out"),
-		  SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "i2c0")),		/* SCK */
+		  SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "i2c0"),		/* SCK */
+		  SUNXI_FUNCTION_VARIANT(0x3,
+					 "pll_lock_dbg",
+					 PINCTRL_SUN8I_R40)),

You have a number of lines where the wrapping is not consistent with
the rest, such as this one, but also...

I think this one is because of extraordinary function name.

Since you don't have a comment, I guess that's not really that bad.

Yes. I tried it and it can fit the space saved by having no comment.

Maxime