On 20/06/17 15:07, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi [mailto:lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 11:29 AM
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
Cc: marc.zyngier at arm.com; sudeep.holla at arm.com; will.deacon at arm.com;
robin.murphy at arm.com; hanjun.guo at linaro.org; Gabriele Paoloni; John
Garry; iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-arm-
kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi at vger.kernel.org; devel at acpica.org;
Linuxarm; Wangzhou (B); Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3:Enable ACPI based
HiSilicon erratum 161010801

Hi Shameer,

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 04:45:00PM +0100, shameer wrote:

quoted

The HiSilicon erratum 161010801 describes the limitation of HiSilicon
platforms Hip06/Hip07 to support the SMMU mappings for MSI

transactions.

quoted

On these platforms GICv3 ITS translator is presented with the deviceID
by extending the MSI payload data to 64 bits to include the deviceID.
Hence, the PCIe controller on this platforms has to differentiate the
MSI payload against other DMA payload and has to modify the MSI

payload.

quoted

This basically makes it difficult for this platforms to have a SMMU
translation for MSI.

This patch implements a ACPI table based quirk to reserve the hw msi
regions in the smmu-v3 driver which means these address regions will
not be translated and will be excluded from iova allocations.

Signed-off-by: shameer <redacted>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-

v3.c

quoted

index abe4b88..f03c63b 100644

--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c

@@ -597,6 +597,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
 	u32				features;

 #define ARM_SMMU_OPT_SKIP_PREFETCH	(1 << 0)
+#define ARM_SMMU_OPT_RESV_HW_MSI	(1 << 1)
 	u32				options;

 	struct arm_smmu_cmdq		cmdq;

@@ -1904,14 +1905,31 @@ static void arm_smmu_get_resv_regions(struct

device *dev,

quoted

 				      struct list_head *head)
 {
 	struct iommu_resv_region *region;
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
+	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
 	int prot = IOMMU_WRITE | IOMMU_NOEXEC | IOMMU_MMIO;

-	region = iommu_alloc_resv_region(MSI_IOVA_BASE,

MSI_IOVA_LENGTH,

quoted

-					 prot, IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI);
-	if (!region)
-		return;
+	smmu = arm_smmu_get_by_fwnode(fwspec->iommu_fwnode);
+
+	if (smmu && (smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_RESV_HW_MSI)

&&

quoted

+		      dev_is_pci(dev)) {

IORT changes are fine to me, I am still no big fan of this supposedly
generic option that is _really_ platform specific (in particular as I
said before the quirk depends on the PCI host bridge but in this
patchset I see no such dependency. In short - the quirk is hooked off
the SMMUv3 model which implicitly implies a PCI host bridge
configuration IIUC). It is Will and Robin decision though, I am not sure
you can make it any tidier (given that on ACPI you may not even have
a PCI host bridge specific _HID to base your check above on).

Thanks Lorenzo. I understand your point. As far as our platform is 
concerned, I think It is ok to remove the dev_is_pci() check and make
it generic, if that helps.  I don't think it will harm us other than couple of
 "HW MSI region resv failed: " logs  for our platform devices.

I think the answer there is that iort_iommu_its_get_resv_regions()
really should distinguish between "this device just doesn't have an ITS
mapping" and "something actually went wrong", such that you don't treat
the former as an error. That's almost certainly cleaner than e.g. trying
to check if dev has an associated MSI domain here before calling it.

Robin.

Hi Will/Robin,
Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,
Shameer