[PATCH v2] [media] davinci: vpif: adaptions for DT support
From: sakari.ailus@iki.fi (Sakari Ailus)
Date: 2017-06-16 08:43:52
Also in:
linux-media
Hi Kevin, On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 09:10:26AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The davinci VPIF is a single hardware block, but the existing driver is broken up into a common library (vpif.c), output (vpif_display.c) and intput (vpif_capture.c). When migrating to DT, to better model the hardware, and because registers, interrupts, etc. are all common,it was decided to have a single VPIF hardware node[1]. Because davinci uses legacy, non-DT boot on several SoCs still, the platform_drivers need to remain. But they are also needed in DT boot. Since there are no DT nodes for the display/capture parts in DT boot (there is a single node for the parent/common device) we need to create platform_devices somewhere to instansiate the platform_drivers. When VPIF display/capture are needed for a DT boot, the VPIF node will have endpoints defined for its subdevs. Therefore, vpif_probe() checks for the presence of endpoints, and if detected manually creates the platform_devices for the display and capture platform_drivers. [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,da850-vpif.txt Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> --- Changes since v1: - added proper error checking to kzalloc calls - rebased onto media/master drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c index 1b02a6363f77..c2d214dfaa3e 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/v4l2-dv-timings.h> +#include <linux/of_graph.h> #include "vpif.h"@@ -423,7 +424,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vpif_channel_getfid); static int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { - static struct resource *res; + static struct resource *res, *res_irq; + struct platform_device *pdev_capture, *pdev_display; + struct device_node *endpoint = NULL; res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); vpif_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);@@ -435,6 +438,58 @@ static int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) spin_lock_init(&vpif_lock); dev_info(&pdev->dev, "vpif probe success\n"); + + /* + * If VPIF Node has endpoints, assume "new" DT support, + * where capture and display drivers don't have DT nodes + * so their devices need to be registered manually here + * for their legacy platform_drivers to work. + */ + endpoint = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(pdev->dev.of_node, + endpoint); + if (!endpoint) + return 0; + + /* + * For DT platforms, manually create platform_devices for + * capture/display drivers. + */ + res_irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0); + if (!res_irq) { + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Missing IRQ resource.\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + pdev_capture = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdev_capture), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (pdev_capture) { + pdev_capture->name = "vpif_capture"; + pdev_capture->id = -1; + pdev_capture->resource = res_irq; + pdev_capture->num_resources = 1; + pdev_capture->dev.dma_mask = pdev->dev.dma_mask; + pdev_capture->dev.coherent_dma_mask = pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask; + pdev_capture->dev.parent = &pdev->dev; + platform_device_register(pdev_capture);
Don't both of these (vpif_capture and vpif_display) depend on platform data? Or do I miss something?
+ } else {
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Unable to allocate memory for pdev_capture.\n");
+ }
+
+ pdev_display = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdev_display),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (pdev_display) {
+ pdev_display->name = "vpif_display";
+ pdev_display->id = -1;
+ pdev_display->resource = res_irq;
+ pdev_display->num_resources = 1;
+ pdev_display->dev.dma_mask = pdev->dev.dma_mask;
+ pdev_display->dev.coherent_dma_mask = pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
+ pdev_display->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
+ platform_device_register(pdev_display);
+ } else {
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Unable to allocate memory for pdev_display.\n");
+ }
+
return 0;
}
-- Regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus at iki.fi XMPP: sailus at retiisi.org.uk