On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:

Hi!

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:45:42PM +0300, Priit Laes wrote:

quoted

SATA clock on sun4i/sun7i is of type (parent) / M / 6 where
6 is fixed post-divider.

Signed-off-by: Priit Laes <redacted>
---
 drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.h |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.c
index c0e5c10..de30e15 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.c

@@ -62,8 +62,13 @@ static unsigned long ccu_div_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	parent_rate = ccu_mux_helper_apply_prediv(&cd->common, &cd->mux, -1,
 						  parent_rate);
 
-	return divider_recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate, val, cd->div.table,
-				   cd->div.flags);
+	val = divider_recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate, val, cd->div.table,
+				  cd->div.flags);
+
+	if (cd->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
+		val /= cd->fixed_post_div;
+
+	return val;
 }
 
 static int ccu_div_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,

@@ -89,6 +94,9 @@ static int ccu_div_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
 	val = divider_get_val(rate, parent_rate, cd->div.table, cd->div.width,
 			      cd->div.flags);
 
+	if (cd->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
+		val *= cd->fixed_post_div;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(cd->common.lock, flags);
 
 	reg = readl(cd->common.base + cd->common.reg);

You also need to adjust the round rate call back to take into account
the post divider before calling divider_round_rate_parent, and after
since that function can modify the parent_rate.

Is there a way to trigger this function? I don't see it getting called.

quoted

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.h b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.h
index 08d0744..f3a5028 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_div.h

@@ -86,9 +86,10 @@ struct ccu_div_internal {
 struct ccu_div {
 	u32			enable;
 
-	struct ccu_div_internal		div;
+	struct ccu_div_internal	div;

Spurious change?

Nope, it was not indented the same way as other variables.
Should I send it as separate patch?

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com