[PATCH v3 2/3] remoteproc/keystone: Add a remoteproc driver for Keystone 2 DSPs
From: Suman Anna <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-26 15:56:38
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-remoteproc, lkml
Hi Bjorn, On 06/25/2017 03:15 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Tue 13 Jun 16:45 PDT 2017, Suman Anna wrote:quoted
+static int keystone_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct keystone_rproc *ksproc = rproc->priv; + int ret; + + INIT_WORK(&ksproc->workqueue, handle_event); + + ret = request_irq(ksproc->irq_ring, keystone_rproc_vring_interrupt, 0, + dev_name(ksproc->dev), ksproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(ksproc->dev, "failed to enable vring interrupt, ret = %d\n", + ret); + goto out; + } + + ret = request_irq(ksproc->irq_fault, keystone_rproc_exception_interrupt, + 0, dev_name(ksproc->dev), ksproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(ksproc->dev, "failed to enable exception interrupt, ret = %d\n", + ret); + goto free_vring_irq; + }I do prefer that your request any resources during probe() and potentially enable/disable them here. If below concern about using a GPIO driver is cleared already I'll take it as is though. [..]quoted
+static void keystone_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) +{ + struct keystone_rproc *ksproc = rproc->priv; + + if (WARN_ON(ksproc->kick_gpio < 0)) + return; + + gpio_set_value(ksproc->kick_gpio, 1); +} +This doesn't sound like a gpio-controller and the GPIO maintainer did reject an attempt by me to use the GPIO framework to abstract a similar thing. Do you already have this driver upstream or have you clarified with the maintainer that the GPIO framework is an acceptable abstraction for this?
Yeah, this has been upstream since quite some time. See commit
2134cb997f2f ("gpio: syscon: reuse for keystone 2 socs").
regards
Suman
It looks equivalent to the "APCS IPC" register found in Qualcomm platforms, previously implemented through a syscon but in v4.13 being pushed to being a mailbox driver. Apart from this I think the series looks good. Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html