Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 2 authors, 2017-06-22

[PATCH] of: update ePAPR references to point to Devicetree Specification

From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring)
Date: 2017-06-22 15:17:03
Also in: linux-crypto, linux-devicetree, linuxppc-dev, lkml, netdev

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 03:23:41AM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 06/18/17 07:05, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:49:04PM -0700, frowand.list at gmail.com wrote:
quoted
From: Frank Rowand <redacted>

The Devicetree Specification has superseded the ePAPR as the
base specification for bindings.  Update files in Documentation
to reference the new document.

Some files are not updated because there is no hypervisor chapter
in the Devicetree Specification:
   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/msi-pic.txt
   Documenation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
   Documenation/virtual/kvm/ppc-pv.txt
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/cpus.txt
index f8cd2397aa04..d63ab1dec16d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/cpus.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/cpus.txt
@@ -3,10 +3,10 @@ Power Architecture CPU Binding
 Copyright 2013 Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
 
 Power Architecture CPUs in Freescale SOCs are represented in device trees as
-per the definition in ePAPR.
+per the definition in the Devicetree Specification.
Are we sure we didn't remove any PPC specifics that apply here?
I don't see any.

Table 3.7.1 "General Properties of CPU nodes" was slightly
re-ordered, but the same properties are listed in both documents.

I don't think that the boot requirements removal impacts this
file.

Am I missing something?
No, I just wanted to make sure. So I guess there's just that one minor 
thing to drop.

Rob
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help