On Saturday, June 3, 2017 12:57:50 PM CEST Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:

Add initial pinctrl driver to support pin configuration with
pinctrl framework for ipq8074.

Signed-off-by: Manoharan Vijaya Raghavan <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <redacted>
---
+- bias-disable:
+	Usage: optional
+	Value type: <none>
+	Definition: The specified pins should be configued as no pull.
+
+- bias-pull-down:
+	Usage: optional
+	Value type: <none>
+	Definition: The specified pins should be configued as pull down.
+
+- bias-pull-up:
+	Usage: optional
+	Value type: <none>
+	Definition: The specified pins should be configued as pull up.
+
+#define REG_SIZE 0x1000
+#define PINGROUP(id, f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7, f8, f9)	\
+	{					        \
+		.name = "gpio" #id,			\
+		.pins = gpio##id##_pins,		\
+		.npins = (unsigned int)ARRAY_SIZE(gpio##id##_pins),	\
+		.funcs = (int[]){			\
+			msm_mux_gpio, /* gpio mode */	\
+			msm_mux_##f1,			\
+			msm_mux_##f2,			\
+			msm_mux_##f3,			\
+			msm_mux_##f4,			\
+			msm_mux_##f5,			\
+			msm_mux_##f6,			\
+			msm_mux_##f7,			\
+			msm_mux_##f8,			\
+			msm_mux_##f9			\
+		},				        \
+		.nfuncs = 10,				\
+		.ctl_reg = REG_SIZE * id,		\
+		.io_reg = 0x4 + REG_SIZE * id,		\
+		.intr_cfg_reg = 0x8 + REG_SIZE * id,		\
+		.intr_status_reg = 0xc + REG_SIZE * id,	\
+		.intr_target_reg = 0x8 + REG_SIZE * id,	\
+		.mux_bit = 2,			\
+		.pull_bit = 0,			\
+		.drv_bit = 6,			\
+		.oe_bit = 9,			\
+		.in_bit = 0,			\
+		.out_bit = 1,			\
+		.intr_enable_bit = 0,		\
+		.intr_status_bit = 0,		\
+		.intr_target_bit = 5,		\
+		.intr_raw_status_bit = 4,	\
+		.intr_polarity_bit = 1,		\
+		.intr_detection_bit = 2,	\
+		.intr_detection_width = 2,	\
+	}
+

Hello,

Back in May, Ram Chandra Jangir posted a rather interesting patch on
the LEDE Mailing-List:
<https://www.mail-archive.com/lede-dev@lists.infradead.org/msg07691.html>
|GPIO_PULL bits configurations in TLMM_GPIO_CFG register
|differs for IPQ40xx from rest of the other qcom SoC's.
|This change add support to configure the msm_gpio_pull
|bits for ipq40xx, It is required to fix the proper
|configurations of gpio-pull bits for nand pins mux.
|
|IPQ40xx SoC:
|2'b10: Internal pull up enable.
|2'b11: Unsupport
|
|For other SoC's:
|2'b10: Keeper
|2'b11: Pull-Up

This information wasn't mentioned anywhere. In fact, the special pull-up
configuration was only discovered due to an issue with the qpic NAND on
the Cisco Meraki MR33. So I wonder what does the gpio-pull look like for
the IPQ8074? Is it the same as the IPQ40XX or does it follow the older 
SoCs?

I'm asking this because I'm preparing a modified version of this patch
that will be posted once the IPQ8074 is ready.

Regards,
Christian