[PATCH 1/4] ARM: ep93xx: switch to SPARSEMEM
From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli)
Date: 2017-05-26 21:50:23
On 05/26/2017 02:28 PM, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
Hello Florian, On 26/05/17 18:13, Florian Fainelli wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
The EP93xx has four chip selects that can be used for the SDRAM memory. These chip selects are decoded to specify an address domain: SDCS3 0x00000000-0x0fffffff with Boot Option ASDO=1 SDCS0 0xc0000000-0xcfffffff SDCS1 0xd0000000-0xdfffffff SDCS2 0xe0000000-x0efffffff SDCS3 0xf0000000-0xffffffff with Boot Option ASDO=0 Because of the row/column/bank architecture of SDRAM, the mapping of these memories into the processor's memory space is discontiguous. Most ep93xx systems only use one of the chip selects. For these systems, ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL has worked fine to handle the discontiguous memory. But, some of the TS-72xx boards use multiple chip selects. The TS-7300 in particular uses SDCS3 (with ASDO=1) and SDCS2. On that system with ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL the SDCS2 memory does not get handled correctly and results in the system not booting. Change the EP93xx to ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE. This handles the discontiguous memory for all configurations. This has been tested on the following ep93xx platforms: EDB9307A with 64 MiB on SDCS0 Vision EP9307 with 64 MiB on SDCS0 TS-7300 with 64 MiB on SDCS3 (with ASDO=1) and 64 MiB on SDCS2 sim.one with 64 MiB on SDCS0 Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <redacted> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> On a TS-3700 with 32MiB of SDRAM, thanks!OK this is weird, this patch applied against v4.11 works fine on a 32MB board configuration, but applied against v4.12-rc2 I now get the following: Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel. Warning: Neither atags nor dtb found as if r2 was lost somehow. I will start a bisection to figure out if/when it started to break. Russell do you have an idea?I've applied the patch to 4.12-rc2 as well (to be more precise, 1b8f2ffc of Linus's tree), and it boots fine on EDB9302 (32MiB one chip on SDCS3). I even ran "memtester" fine, one iteration.
I need to debug this further because it does not make sense to me why this patch on 4.12-rc1 works but on on 4.1-2-rc2 other than just having a bit more bloat one image vs. another. Thanks!
So, from my PoV Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com> -- Regards, Alexander.
-- Florian