[PATCH 2/6] mfd: hi6421-pmic: move hi6421_regmap_config definition to header file
From: Guodong Xu <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-27 03:08:34
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Guodong Xu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Move hi6421_regmap_config definition from c code to common header: - include/linux/mfd/hi6421-pmic.h This is to improve code re-use for upcoming hi6421 series of MFD driver. Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <redacted>quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/hi6421-pmic.h b/include/linux/mfd/hi6421-pmic.h index 587273e..f4674ff 100644 --- a/include/linux/mfd/hi6421-pmic.h +++ b/include/linux/mfd/hi6421-pmic.h@@ -38,4 +38,10 @@ struct hi6421_pmic { struct regmap *regmap; }; +static const struct regmap_config hi6421_regmap_config = { + .reg_bits = 32, + .reg_stride = 4, + .val_bits = 8, + .max_register = HI6421_REG_TO_BUS_ADDR(HI6421_REG_MAX), +}; #endif /* __HI6421_PMIC_H */Header files should not have static variables in general, it will cause warnings about unused variables when you include the header from another file (depending on compiler version and warning options, I think older gcc versions don't warn about this, but clang and latest gcc do).
I will fix that.
How about adding the new code into the existing drivers/mfd/hi6421-pmic-core.c file, and splitting out the part that differs (the regmap_update_bits is the only difference I see)
Yes, indeed.
into a callback that you reference through the of_device_id->data pointer?
Thanks Arnd. I will look into this. I'll drop hi6421v530-pmic.c and resend this patchset. -Guodong
Arnd