[PATCH v1] PM / devfreq: exynos-nocp : Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable
From: cw00.choi@samsung.com (Chanwoo Choi)
Date: 2017-05-24 01:57:02
Also in:
linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
From: cw00.choi@samsung.com (Chanwoo Choi)
Date: 2017-05-24 01:57:02
Also in:
linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On 2017? 05? 23? 18:43, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Arvind, On 2017? 05? 19? 19:50, Arvind Yadav wrote:quoted
clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value. Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <redacted> --- drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-nocp.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-nocp.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-nocp.c index 5c3e7b1..f6e7956 100644 --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-nocp.c +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/exynos-nocp.c@@ -267,7 +267,11 @@ static int exynos_nocp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nocp); - clk_prepare_enable(nocp->clk); + ret = clk_prepare_enable(nocp->clk); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to prepare ppmu clock\n"); + return ret; + }I already replied from the similar patch. Thanks.quoted
pr_info("exynos-nocp: new NoC Probe device registered: %s\n", dev_name(dev));
I'm missing some point that if there is no clock this driver initializes 'nocp->clk = NULL;' on 217 line. Looks good to me. Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics