[PATCH v3 2/6] mm, gup: Ensure real head page is ref-counted when using hugepages
From: Punit Agrawal <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-23 15:43:55
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
"Kirill A. Shutemov" [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:36:00PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:quoted
When speculatively taking references to a hugepage using page_cache_add_speculative() in gup_huge_pmd(), it is assumed that the page returned by pmd_page() is the head page. Although normally true, this assumption doesn't hold when the hugepage comprises of successive page table entries such as when using contiguous bit on arm64 at PTE or PMD levels. This can be addressed by ensuring that the page passed to page_cache_add_speculative() is the real head or by de-referencing the head page within the function. We take the first approach to keep the usage pattern aligned with page_cache_get_speculative() where users already pass the appropriate page, i.e., the de-referenced head. Apply the same logic to fix gup_huge_[pud|pgd]() as well.Hm. Okay. But I'm kinda surprise that this is the only place that need to be adjusted. Have you validated all other pmd_page() use-cases?
I came across the gup issues were found while investigating a failing test from mce-tests. I think the problem here is not due to the use of pmd_page() but because page_cache_[add|get]_speculative() don't ensure they ref-count the head page as is done in get_page(). Having said that, I had a quick look at the other uses of pmd_page() - Quite a few of them are followed by an explicit BUG_ON() to check that the page returned is a head page. All other instances seem to be dealing with transparent hugepages where contiguous hugepages are not supported. I don't see any call sites that ring alarm bells. Did you have any particular part of the code in mind where pmd_page() usage might be a problem? Thanks, Punit