On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:08 AM, Florian Fainelli [off-list ref] wrote:

On 05/16/2017 09:24 PM, Anup Patel wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Olof Johansson [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi,



On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Anup Patel [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This patchset adds initial support of Broadcom Stingray SOC
by reusing existing Broadcom iProc device drivers.

Most of the patches in this patchset are DT patches except
the Stingray clock tree support which just one patch.

This patchset is based on Linux-4.12-rc1 and it is also available
at stingray-v3 branch of https://github.com/Broadcom/arm64-linux.git

Changes since v2:
 - Remove default bootargs from chosen DT node
 - Remove "linux" prefix from stdout DT attribute of chosen DT node
 - Remove use of GIC_CPU_MASK_xxx() for PPIs

Changes since v1:
 - Rebased patches for Linux-4.12-rc1
 - Removed unwanted /memreserve/ from bcm958742-base.dtsi
 - Use ranges DT property to clear view of memory-layout
 - Make bcm-sr.h part of clock DT bindings patch

Anup Patel (3):
  dt-bindings: bcm: Add Broadcom Stingray bindings document
  arm64: dts: Initial DTS files for Broadcom Stingray SOC
  arm64: dts: Add PL022, PL330 and SP805 DT nodes for Stingray

Oza Pawandeep (1):
  arm64: dts: Add I2C DT nodes for Stingray SoC

Pramod Kumar (3):
  arm64: dts: Add NAND DT nodes for Stingray SOC
  arm64: dts: Add pinctrl DT nodes for Stingray SOC
  arm64: dts: Add GPIO DT nodes for Stingray SOC

Sandeep Tripathy (3):
  dt-bindings: clk: Extend binding doc for Stingray SOC
  clk: bcm: Add clocks for Stingray SOC
  arm64: dts: Add clock DT nodes for Stingray SOC

Srinath Mannam (1):
  arm64: dts: Add PWM and SDHCI DT nodes for Stingray SOC

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,stingray.txt  |  12 +
 .../bindings/clock/brcm,iproc-clocks.txt           |  76 ++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile              |   1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/Makefile     |   6 +
 .../boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742-base.dtsi | 131 ++++++
 .../boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742k.dts      |  78 ++++
 .../boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742t.dts      |  40 ++
 .../boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-clock.dtsi | 170 ++++++++
 .../dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-pinctrl.dtsi    | 345 ++++++++++++++++
 .../arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray.dtsi | 460 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/bcm/Kconfig                            |   8 +
 drivers/clk/bcm/Makefile                           |   1 +
 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-sr.c                           | 300 ++++++++++++++
 include/dt-bindings/clock/bcm-sr.h                 | 101 +++++
 .../dt-bindings/pinctrl/brcm,pinctrl-stingray.h    |  68 +++
 15 files changed, 1797 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,stingray.txt
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/Makefile
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742-base.dtsi
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742k.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/bcm958742t.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-clock.dtsi
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray-pinctrl.dtsi
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/stingray/stingray.dtsi
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-sr.c
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/bcm-sr.h
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/brcm,pinctrl-stingray.h

Grouping as one patchset for review is fine, but when you submit this
for merge you need to split it up:

- Documentation/devicetree can go with the driver pieces or with the
DT changes, your choice
- DTS/DTSI changes should go through the Broadcom maintainers to arm-soc
- clk changes should go to clk maintainers.

Only PATCH3 needs to go through clk maintainers rest all patches
are DT bindings document and DTS changes which can go through
Broadcom tree. Right ??

Patch 2 and 3 should go through the clock maintainers, and I can take
the remaining patches through the Broadcom ARM/ARM64 SoC pull requests,
no problem.

Unless there are specific changes requested which warrant a v4, I can
coordinate with Stephen and Mike to make sure that they take the
appropriate patches.

We have minor changes in clk driver to address Stephen's comments.

I will send v4 patchset will updated clk driver.

Thanks,
Anup