On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 08:01:07AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

I'd prefer not to mix things in scripts/dtc that aren't the import of
dtc (yes, we do have a few other things already, but they are at least
scripts). Couldn't this go in include/dt-bindings/ instead?

I don't think that works.

The include path used is "include", which means that we force people
to use:

#include <dt-bindings/foo.dtsi>

No, I was thinking you'd add include/dt-bindings/include-prefix/ to
the include path instead of scripts/dtc/include-prefix/. The only
downside I can see is people could mistakenly do:

#include <dt-bindings/include-prefix/$arch/foo.dtsi>

in their DT files.  This means that we'd need to populate $topdir/include
with per-architecture symlinks on top of the 26 or so directories already
there, so that:

#include <arch/foo.dtsi>

would work.  That's quite horrible, since $topdir/include is the main
include path for C headers.

I guess we could have symlinks inside include/dt-bindings, but that
makes the includes:

#include <dt-bindings/arch/foo.dtsi>

but that's rather absurd because these _aren't_ dt-binding definitions.

True, but the same can be said that "scripts/dtc" is not includes nor
kernel build infrastructure.

Maybe what we should do is:

mkdir include/dt
git mv include/dt-bindings include/dt
for arch in arch/*; do
  dts=$arch/boot/dts
  if [ -d $dts ]; then
     a=include/dt/$(basename $arch)
     ln -s $dts $a
     git add $a
  fi
done
... fixup scripts/Makefile.lib ...
git commit

That would just break every existing include in dts files.

Another idea. Could kbuild create all the symlinks at build time instead?

Rob