Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2017-04-04
STALE3343d
Revisions (7)
  1. rfc [diff vs current]
  2. rfc [diff vs current]
  3. v1 [diff vs current]
  4. v1 [diff vs current]
  5. v1 [diff vs current]
  6. v1 [diff vs current]
  7. v1 current

[PATCH 00/15] arm64/kvm: use common sysreg definitions

From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2017-03-29 09:55:32
Also in: kvmarm

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:41:47AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:29:31PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 07:48:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 06:35:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
quoted
I think it would make sense for those to be in a common branch taken by
both the arm64 and KVM trees, with the KVM-specific parts being taken by
KVM alone atop of that.

Would everyone be happy with that?
I'm happy with that.
quoted
For reference, I've updated my branches so that arm64/common-sysreg only
contains the common parts, with the KVM parts atop of that in
kvm/common-sysreg.
Will, Catalin:  Let me know if you're going to pull from common-sysreg
and I'll do the same and add the kvm patches above.
I think that's what we'll do, but Catalin's out this week (we're taking it
in turns to go to work). I'd say go ahead and pull it into kvm if there
aren't any conflicts. No need to wait for us.

Mark -- those branches are stable, right?
They are now. I will not touch either branch.

Thanks,
Mark.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help