[PATCH v3 01/25] arm64: hyp-stub: Implement HVC_RESET_VECTORS stub hypercall
From: Marc Zyngier <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-21 18:36:51
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm
Subsystem:
arm64 port (aarch64 architecture), kernel virtual machine for arm64 (kvm/arm64), the rest · Maintainers:
Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Marc Zyngier, Oliver Upton, Linus Torvalds
On 21/03/17 17:41, James Morse wrote:
On 21/03/17 17:37, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
On 21/03/17 17:25, James Morse wrote:quoted
On 21/03/17 17:04, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:24:34PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
Let's define a new stub hypercall that resets the HYP configuration to its default: hyp-stub vectors, and MMU disabled. Of course, for the hyp-stub itself, this is a trivial no-op. Hypervisors will have a bit more work to do. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <redacted> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 9 +++++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S | 13 ++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)[...]quoted
+ENTRY(__hyp_reset_vectors) + str lr, [sp, #-16]! + mov x0, #HVC_RESET_VECTORS + hvc #0 + ldr lr, [sp], #16 + ret +ENDPROC(__hyp_reset_vectors)Why do we need to specifically preserve lr across the hvc call? Is it corrupted by the EL2 code (if yes, are other caller-saved registers that need preserving)? I don't see something similar in the arch/arm code.Kexec on arm64 needed a register to clobber in the hyp-stub's el1_sync code. We wanted to preserve all the registers so soft_restart() could look more like a function call.I don't think we need this anymore. Once we enter __cpu_soft_restart(), there is no turning back. Or am I missing something else?My recollection of the history may be wrong: but we needed to mess with esr_el2 before we know its a soft_restart() call, at which point we didn't want to clobber the registers. This was the strange use of x18 in kexec.
After a bit of digging together with James, we found the guilty one. The hyp-stub entry code uses lr (aka x30) as a scratch register to find out if we've made it here via a HVC instruction. This is an absolutely pointless test, because by definition HVC is the only way to get there. I've ended up with the following patch:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
index 8ccdd549f7c7..210bd6b3849d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S@@ -55,12 +55,6 @@ ENDPROC(__hyp_stub_vectors) .align 11 el1_sync: - mrs x30, esr_el2 - lsr x30, x30, #ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT - - cmp x30, #ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64 - b.ne 9f // Not an HVC trap - cmp x0, #HVC_SET_VECTORS b.ne 2f msr vbar_el2, x1
@@ -120,18 +114,14 @@ ENDPROC(\label) */ ENTRY(__hyp_set_vectors) - str lr, [sp, #-16]! mov x1, x0 mov x0, #HVC_SET_VECTORS hvc #0 - ldr lr, [sp], #16 ret ENDPROC(__hyp_set_vectors) ENTRY(__hyp_reset_vectors) - str lr, [sp, #-16]! mov x0, #HVC_RESET_VECTORS hvc #0 - ldr lr, [sp], #16 ret ENDPROC(__hyp_reset_vectors)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S
index 1277f81b63b7..5170ce1021da 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S@@ -32,17 +32,17 @@ * Shuffle the parameters before calling the function * pointed to in x0. Assumes parameters in x[1,2,3]. */ + str lr, [sp, #-16]! mov lr, x0 mov x0, x1 mov x1, x2 mov x2, x3 blr lr + ldr lr, [sp], #16 .endm ENTRY(__vhe_hyp_call) - str lr, [sp, #-16]! do_el2_call - ldr lr, [sp], #16 /* * We used to rely on having an exception return to get * an implicit isb. In the E2H case, we don't have it anymore.
I'll split that in convenient patches and repost the series. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...