Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2017-03-08

[PATCH V8 01/11] iommu/of: Refactor of_iommu_configure() for error handling

From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy)
Date: 2017-03-08 19:28:48
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu, linux-pci

On 08/03/17 18:58, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
[...]
quoted
 static const struct iommu_ops
-*of_pci_iommu_configure(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct device_node *bridge_np)
+*of_pci_iommu_init(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct device_node *bridge_np)
 {
 	const struct iommu_ops *ops;
 	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec;
+	int err;
 
 	/*
 	 * Start by tracing the RID alias down the PCI topology as
@@ -123,56 +146,56 @@ static int __get_pci_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *data)
 	 * bus into the system beyond, and which IOMMU it ends up at.
 	 */
 	iommu_spec.np = NULL;
-	if (of_pci_map_rid(bridge_np, iommu_spec.args[0], "iommu-map",
-			   "iommu-map-mask", &iommu_spec.np, iommu_spec.args))
-		return NULL;
+	err = of_pci_map_rid(bridge_np, iommu_spec.args[0], "iommu-map",
+			     "iommu-map-mask", &iommu_spec.np,
+			     iommu_spec.args);
+	if (err)
+		return ERR_PTR(err);
This change doesn't work with of_pci_map_rid when the PCI RC isn't behind
an IOMMU:

        map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_len);
        if (!map) {
                if (target)
                        return -ENODEV;
                /* Otherwise, no map implies no translation */
                *id_out = rid;
                return 0;
        }

Previously with no iommu-map, we returned -ENODEV but it was discarded by
of_pci_iommu_configure. Now it is propagated and the whole device probing
fails. Instead, maybe of_pci_map_rid should always return 0 if no
iommu-map, and the caller should check if *target is still NULL?
Ah yes, Tomasz had found breakages with the "mmu-masters" binding
before, and I'd already pushed out a fixup for this one[1], but I forgot
that that discussion was all off-list (out of diplomatic concern that
the breakage might have been intentional - it wasn't, honest!)

Now that rc1 is out I should re-do that branch with v8 of this series
plus the fixups folded in, unless Sricharan beats me to it.

Thanks for the reminder,
Robin.

[1]:http://www.linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-rm.git;a=commitdiff;h=0049a34e523506813995c05766f5e2c16d616354
Thanks,
Jean-Philippe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help