[PATCH v22 00/11] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2017-03-28 15:01:54
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-watchdog, lkml
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2017-03-28 15:01:54
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-watchdog, lkml
Hi, On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:29:10PM +0800, Fu Wei wrote:
On 28 March 2017 at 21:05, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Sorry for the delay; I have not had the time to focus on this as I would like to. I'm happy with patches 1-4, but from patch 5 onwards, there's one change I'd like to see. I'd prefer that mmio timer frame rame N was always stored at arch_timer_mem::frame[N], rather than arch_timer_mem::frame[] being in an arbitrary order. That will make arch_timer_mem_frame::frame_nr redundant. To allow arch_timer_mem::frame[] this to be sparse, I'm happy to have a bool arch_timer_mem_frame::valid field that we set when probing each frame. Then we don't need arch_timer_mem::num_frames. This will make iterating over the frames far less confusing, and makes it simple to detect when a frame number is erroneously reused. Otherwise, I'm largely happy to pick the rest and apply any fixups myself.Great thanks for your feedback! I will follow your suggestion to improve my patches, then post it in a day.
Thanks, that is much appreciated.
So I will rebase my patchset on arch-timer/gtdt branch of your REPO https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arch-timer/gtdt
Yes please! The current HEAD should be:
ebbfe8889cffa12f ("clocksource: arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init call").
Thanks,
Mark.