On 27.03.2017 16:15, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

On 27/03/2017 at 15:02:37 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:

quoted

Hi Claudiu,

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:29:34 +0200
Claudiu Beznea [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

 static const struct platform_device_id atmel_pwm_devtypes[] = {
 	{
 		.name = "at91sam9rl-pwm",
-		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_data_v1,
+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_regs_v1,
 	}, {
 		.name = "sama5d3-pwm",
-		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_data_v2,
+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&atmel_pwm_regs_v2,
 	}, {
 		/* sentinel */
 	},

Unrelated to this series, but can you prepare a patch to get rid of
this platform id table (AT91 platforms have completely switched to DT
for quite some time now).

Please, don't until AVR32 is gone.

Sure, I will wait for it.

quoted

You can also get rid of the "if (pdev->dev.of_node)" condition in
atmel_pwm_probe() since it's guaranteed to be true, otherwise the
->probe() method wouldn't be called.

Thanks,

Boris