Hi,

On 23/03/2017 10:52, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Sebastian Reichel [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:34:45PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:

quoted

P.S. I'm thinking about having MFD_AXP20X imply its various sub-drivers.
Not sure if that was the intended usage of the new imply syntax though.

I think adding "default MFD_AXP20X" to the sub-drivers is cleaner,
as you will not end up with a long list.

I'd still need to add imply statements for the various subsystems though,
like regulators, power supplies, extcon, etc..
But I suppose that's cleaner, and fits the original intent of the syntax.

Hum. I don't really understand what you are saying.. Am I supposed to
modify something or, is it okay and we're waiting for Lee to apply on
his tree?

Thanks in advance for clearing it up,

Quentin

-- 
Quentin Schulz, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com