[PATCH] serial: 8250: 8250_core: Fix irq name for 8250 serial irq
From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy)
Date: 2017-03-16 14:56:15
Also in:
linux-serial, lkml
On 16/03/17 13:36, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:56:53PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:quoted
Using dev_name() as irq name during request_irq() might be misleading in case of serial over PCI. Therefore use a better alternative name for identifying serial port irqs as "serial" appended with serial_index of the port. This ensures that "serial" string is always present in irq name while port index will help in distinguishing b/w different ports.Wouldn't it be better to use the device name (iow, ttySx) rather than "serialx" ? Maybe a helper function in serial_core.c to format the device name into a supplied string, which can be re-used elsewhere, eg, uart_report_port() and uart_suspend_port(). IOW: const char *uart_port_name(char *buf, size_t n, struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *port) { snprintf(buf, n, "%s%d", drv->dev_name, drv->tty_driver->name_base + port->line); return buf; } which means you can do this: char name[16]; request_irq(..., uart_port_name(name, sizeof(name), driver, port), ...) which also avoids the allocation.
...and makes 'cat /proc/interrupts' particularly fun later: 8: 0 GICv2 72 Level ??h ????V! Unless a suitably long-lived string already exists somewhere else in the serial core, the allocation is unavoidable, although kasprintf() (or its devm_ variant) might make matters a little simpler. Robin.
8250 device names are always "ttyS" plus a number, so 16 characters (including NULL terminator) should be more than sufficient, and that's most likely true of all serial drivers. (The longest device name I'm aware of is ttyAMA plus a small integer for PL011 ports.)