Am Mittwoch, 15. M?rz 2017, 18:03:52 CET schrieb cl at rock-chips.com:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Chen Liang <redacted>
The rk3328 saradc is the same as rk3399.
Signed-off-by: Chen Liang <redacted>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt index
205593f..f81bc20 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Required properties:
- "rockchip,saradc": for rk3188, rk3288
- "rockchip,rk3066-tsadc": for rk3036
- "rockchip,rk3399-saradc": for rk3399
+ - "rockchip,rk3328-saradc", "rockchip,rk3399-saradc": for rk3328
not sure how iio people see that, but I would suggest keeping the order, so
put rk3328 above rk3399.
Heiko