[PATCH v31 02/12] arm64: limit memory regions based on DT property, usable-memory-range
From: AKASHI Takahiro <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-02 04:21:36
Also in:
kexec
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 03:07:00PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi, On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:46:21PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:quoted
+static int __init early_init_dt_scan_usablemem(unsigned long node, + const char *uname, int depth, void *data) +{ + struct memblock_region *usablemem = (struct memblock_region *)data;Nit: unnecessary cast.
OK
quoted
+ const __be32 *reg; + int len; + + usablemem->size = 0;Could we please lift this assignment/initialisation into the caller...quoted
+ + if (depth != 1 || strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0) + return 0; + + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,usable-memory-range", &len); + if (!reg || (len < (dt_root_addr_cells + dt_root_size_cells))) + return 1; + + usablemem->base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells, ®); + usablemem->size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells, ®); + + return 1; +} + +static void __init fdt_enforce_memory_region(void) +{ + struct memblock_region reg;... e.g. have: struct memblock_region reg = { .size = 0, };
Sure
That saves us from making unnecessary assignments to the size field, and makes it clear that reg.size has definitely been initialised, regardless of what of_scan_flat_dt() happens to do. With that: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Thanks, -Takahiro AKASHI
Thanks, Mark.quoted
+ + of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_usablemem, ®); + + if (reg.size) + memblock_cap_memory_range(reg.base, reg.size); +} + void __init arm64_memblock_init(void) { const s64 linear_region_size = -(s64)PAGE_OFFSET; + /* Handle linux,usable-memory-range property */ + fdt_enforce_memory_region(); + /* * Ensure that the linear region takes up exactly half of the kernel * virtual address space. This way, we can distinguish a linear address -- 2.11.0