Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 7 authors, 2017-02-10

[PATCH v6 2/4] Documentation: dt: add bindings for ti-cpufreq

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-10 12:28:00
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-omap, linux-pm

On Friday, February 10, 2017 08:43:49 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 09-02-17, 23:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
In particular, Viresh, if you ACK something, please make sure that it
doesn't conflict with your own patches.
I hope you are talking about the patch 3/4 for which Arnd also sent a
fix.  I acked it back on 18th of January and Dave has been carrying my
Ack since then. When he posted again, I didn't went into reviewing it
again as I saw my Ack being there.
Well, OK, but you did know that the OPP API had changed in the meantime,
so it wouldn't have hurt to double check I suppose?
Yes, he ended up using an API which just got updated after 18th of Jan
and yes both me and Dave missed that. But I feel it is difficult to
take care of scenarios like this. Perhaps he should have made sure
that he base it of pm/linux-next and nothing would have gone wrong.
Yes, that would help, but then how to enforce that?

Thanks,
Rafael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help