Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2017-04-10

Recommended notation for OPP to avoid DTC warnings

From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2017-02-27 10:54:18
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-pm, lkml

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 02:18:03PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Hi.


Decumentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
takes examples like this:

        opp at 1000000000 {
                opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
                opp-microvolt = <970000 975000 985000>;
                opp-microamp = <70000>;
                clock-latency-ns = <300000>;
                opp-suspend;
        };
If we follow this notation and the device-tree is built with W=1,
DTC warns like follows:

Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp at 1000000000 has a
unit name, but no reg property

Is there a recommended notation to avoid it?

Maybe, simply omit the "@" ?
I think just s/@/-/ should be fine, e.g. call the above opp-1000000000.

Thanks,
Mark.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help