On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 01:54:37 +0200
Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Boris Brezillon
[off-list ref] wrote:  

quoted

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:38:03 +0100
Boris Brezillon [off-list ref] wrote:
 

quoted

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:27:17 +0200
Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] wrote:
 

quoted

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Boris Brezillon
[off-list ref] wrote:
 

quoted

 drivers/mtd/nand/atmel/nand-controller.c | 2269 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c            | 2479 ------------------------------  

Does -M -C help you?
At least it would help reviewers
 

No it doesn't, because files were not just moved around using git mv,
it's a complete rewrite of the driver. IIUC, you're about to review
this submission, or are you just trolling like last time?  

My bad, I mistaken you with someone else. Sorry for being harsh, but my
explanation stands ;-).  

No problem. I was asking since it so big and on first glance looks
like a partial copy (I dunno if parameter to -C makes it somehow
useful), though I can't review this. It's too big to me. Sorry I'm
really not trolling, just didn't read commit message carefully.  

Okay, I very quickly looked into the code, what I noticed
- you like extra parens and empty lines in some cases (not big deal)

Can you point specific places where you think these are not needed?

- some functions perhaps might have been refactored to have common
pieces in error handling, though I didn't read core carefully.

Again, be more precise.

Most important part I have noticed is a GPIO request.
I didn't get why you almost repeat gpiod_get() in case of platform data?
Shouldn't we have GPIO look up table?
Can we use builtin device properties (for GPIO and/or overall)?

Sorry but I don't get it. Can give an example of what you'd like me to
do?

Thanks,

Boris