On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:14:14PM +0100, Robert Richter wrote:

On 17.01.17 19:16:56, Will Deacon wrote:

quoted

I can't really see the trend given that, for system time, your
pfn_valid_within results have a variance of ~9 and the early_pfn_valid
results have a variance of ~92. Given that the variance seems to come
about due to the reboots, I think we need more numbers to establish whether
the data sets end up largely overlapping or if they really are disjoint.

Assuming the numbers of both versions are not significant, please
apply one or the other.

I'd rather apply the pfn_valid_within version, but please can you Ack the
patch first, since there was some confusion when it was posted about a
translation fault that was never reproduced.

Thanks,

Will