On 03/02/17 15:35, Sinan Kaya wrote:

On 2/3/2017 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:

quoted

On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote:

quoted

On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:

quoted

From: Hanjun Guo <redacted>

With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi
is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform
msi support.

For platform device connecting to ITS on arm platform, we have IORT
table with the named componant node to describe the mappings of paltform
device and ITS, so we can retrieve the dev id and find its parent
irqdomain (ITS) from IORT table (simlar with the ACPI ITS support).

I understand that there is a consensus on IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces
of this series while there is some ongoing work on the MBIgen part in
due to dependency on Agustin's patch vs. ACPI definitions.

Can we merge the IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces to 4.11 so that the base
implementation comes in place?

Sorry, but I may be missing something. Which IORT/SMMUv3 patches are we
talking about? Do you have a pointer to a series?

I was talking about patches V8 00-12 of this particular one. 

[PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

Patches 13-15 are specific for MBIGEN. 00-12 are for the base functionality.

Is that to support SMMUv3's own MSI generation? It would be helpful if
you explained why you want this code to be merged beforehand,
potentially without any in-tree user.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...