On Thursday, January 26, 2017 10:46:25 AM CET Linus Walleij wrote:

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Marek Szyprowski
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 2017-01-26 10:10, Linus Walleij wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Marek Szyprowski
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This patch moves pad retention control from PMU driver to Exynos pin
controller driver. This helps to avoid possible ordering and logical
dependencies between machine, PMU and pin control code. Till now it
worked fine only because sys_ops for PMU and pin controller were called
in registration order.
This is also a preparation for adding new features to Exynos pin
controller driver, like runtime power management and suspending
individual pin controllers, which might be a part of some power domain.

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <redacted>
---
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c           |  64 --------------
  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 145
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This makes all kind of sense, but I would ideally like an ACK
from the ARM SoC maintainer(s): Arnd, Olof, are you OK with
this?

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

quoted

Isn't enough to have Krzysztof's (Exynos SoC maintainer) 'reviewed-by' tag?
I assume that 'reviewed-by' also includes 'acked-by'.

If the SoC maintainers are too stressed to answer in reasonable time
or I just get randomly bored of waiting yes, I usually apply it anyway.

Just want to give them a heads-up essentially.

Agreed, that is a reasonable strategy.

	Arnd