Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2017-01-20

[PATCH V5 08/12] iommu/arm-smmu: Clean up early-probing workarounds

From: Sricharan <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-20 06:32:13
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu

Hi Robin,
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-arm-msm-owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Robin Murphy
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 11:28 PM
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <redacted>; Sricharan R <redacted>
Cc: will.deacon at arm.com; joro at 8bytes.org; iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-
msm at vger.kernel.org; m.szyprowski at samsung.com 
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 08/12] iommu/arm-smmu: Clean up early-probing workarounds

On 19/01/17 16:50, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:35:52PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
quoted
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

Now that the appropriate ordering is enforced via profe-deferral of
masters in core code, rip it all out and bask in the simplicity.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
[Sricharan: Rebased on top of ACPI IORT SMMU series]
Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <redacted>
---
 * No change
Well, a tad too early on the series for ACPI, aka if we bisect the
series here you would break ACPI.

Totally agree on the patch, but you should move it to the end of the
series.
Indeed - I think a more appropriate ordering of the current patch
numbers would be:

1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 5+10 (squashed), 6, 11, 7, 8, 12
Ok, will repost with this order.

Regards,
 Sricharan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help