[PATCH V5 08/12] iommu/arm-smmu: Clean up early-probing workarounds
From: Sricharan <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-20 06:32:13
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu
Hi Robin,
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-arm-msm-owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Robin Murphy
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 11:28 PM To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <redacted>; Sricharan R <redacted> Cc: will.deacon at arm.com; joro at 8bytes.org; iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-arm- msm at vger.kernel.org; m.szyprowski at samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 08/12] iommu/arm-smmu: Clean up early-probing workarounds On 19/01/17 16:50, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:35:52PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:quoted
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Now that the appropriate ordering is enforced via profe-deferral of masters in core code, rip it all out and bask in the simplicity. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> [Sricharan: Rebased on top of ACPI IORT SMMU series] Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <redacted> --- * No changeWell, a tad too early on the series for ACPI, aka if we bisect the series here you would break ACPI. Totally agree on the patch, but you should move it to the end of the series.Indeed - I think a more appropriate ordering of the current patch numbers would be: 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 5+10 (squashed), 6, 11, 7, 8, 12
Ok, will repost with this order. Regards, Sricharan