[PATCH V5 05/12] drivers: platform: Configure dma operations at probe time
From: Sricharan <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-20 06:18:18
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu
Hi Robin,
On 19/01/17 15:05, Sricharan R wrote:quoted
Configuring DMA ops at probe time will allow deferring device probe when the IOMMU isn't available yet. The dma_configure for the device is now called from the generic device_attach callback just before the bus/driver probe is called. This way, configuring the DMA ops for the device would be called at the same place for all bus_types, hence the deferred probing mechanism should work for all buses as well. pci_bus_add_devices (platform/amba)(_device_create/driver_register) | | pci_bus_add_device (device_add/driver_register) | | device_attach device_initial_probe | | __device_attach_driver __device_attach_driver | driver_probe_device | really_probe | dma_configure Similarly on the device/driver_unregister path __device_release_driver is called which inturn calls dma_deconfigure. Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <redacted> --- * Removed the dma configuration for the pci devices in case of DT from pci_dma_configure which was hanging outside separately and doing it in dma_configure function itself. drivers/base/dd.c | 9 +++++++++ drivers/base/dma-mapping.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/of/platform.c | 5 +---- drivers/pci/probe.c | 5 +---- include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 3 +++ 5 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c index a1fbf55..4882f06 100644 --- a/drivers/base/dd.c +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include <linux/device.h> #include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/kthread.h> #include <linux/wait.h>@@ -356,6 +357,10 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv) if (ret) goto pinctrl_bind_failed; + ret = dma_configure(dev); + if (ret) + goto dma_failed; + if (driver_sysfs_add(dev)) { printk(KERN_ERR "%s: driver_sysfs_add(%s) failed\n", __func__, dev_name(dev));@@ -417,6 +422,8 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv) goto done; probe_failed: + dma_deconfigure(dev); +dma_failed: if (dev->bus) blocking_notifier_call_chain(&dev->bus->p->bus_notifier, BUS_NOTIFY_DRIVER_NOT_BOUND, dev);@@ -826,6 +833,8 @@ static void __device_release_driver(struct device *dev, struct device *parent) drv->remove(dev); device_links_driver_cleanup(dev); + dma_deconfigure(dev); + devres_release_all(dev); dev->driver = NULL; dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c b/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c index efd71cf..dfe6fd7 100644 --- a/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c +++ b/drivers/base/dma-mapping.c@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/dma-mapping.h> #include <linux/export.h> #include <linux/gfp.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>@@ -341,3 +342,34 @@ void dma_common_free_remap(void *cpu_addr, size_t size, unsigned long vm_flags) vunmap(cpu_addr); } #endif + +/* + * Common configuration to enable DMA API use for a device + */ +#include <linux/pci.h> + +int dma_configure(struct device *dev) +{ + struct device *_dev = dev; + int is_pci = dev_is_pci(dev); + + if (is_pci) { + _dev = pci_get_host_bridge_device(to_pci_dev(dev)); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && _dev->parent && + _dev->parent->of_node) + _dev = _dev->parent; + } + + if (_dev->of_node) + of_dma_configure(dev, _dev->of_node); + + if (is_pci) + pci_put_host_bridge_device(_dev);There's a fun bug here - at this point _dev is the *parent* of the bridge device, so we put the refcount on the wrong device (the platform device representing the host controller, rather than the PCI device representing its insides), which frees the guy we're in the middle of probing, and things rapidly go wrong afterwards:
ha my bad, right. I will change to fix this. I was testing this with a couple of pci devices, but it did not show up. Thanks for pointing this out. I will borrow the variable names from the hunk below.
[ 1.461026] bus: 'platform': driver_probe_device: matched device
40000000.pcie-controller with driver pci-host-generic
[ 1.471640] bus: 'platform': really_probe: probing driver
pci-host-generic with device 40000000.pcie-controller
[ 1.481678] OF: PCI: host bridge /pcie-controller at 40000000 ranges:
...
[ 2.158259] bus: 'pci': driver_probe_device: matched device
0000:02:10.0 with driver pcieport
[ 2.166716] bus: 'pci': really_probe: probing driver pcieport with
device 0000:02:10.0
[ 2.174590] pci 0000:02:10.0: Driver pcieport requests probe deferral
[ 2.180978] pci 0000:02:10.0: Added to deferred list
[ 2.185915] bus: 'pci': driver_probe_device: matched device
0000:02:1f.0 with driver pcieport
[ 2.194366] bus: 'pci': really_probe: probing driver pcieport with
device 0000:02:1f.0
[ 2.202237] pci 0000:02:1f.0: Driver pcieport requests probe deferral
[ 2.208625] pci 0000:02:1f.0: Added to deferred list
[ 2.213582] driver: 'pci-host-generic': driver_bound: bound to device
'???v????.pcie-controller'
[ 2.222293] bus: 'platform': really_probe: bound device
???v????.pcie-controller to driver pci-host-generic
[ 2.232041] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 00000000
I recall debugging this same issue before, and I seem to have a local
version of this commit dated about 6 weeks ago where dma_configure()
looks like this:
--->8---
int dma_configure(struct device *dev)
{
struct device *bridge = NULL, *dma_dev = dev;
if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
bridge = pci_get_host_bridge_device(to_pci_dev(dev));
dma_dev = bridge->parent;
}
if (dma_dev && dma_dev->of_node) {
of_dma_configure(dev, dma_dev->of_node);
} else if (dma_dev && has_acpi_companion(dma_dev)) {
struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device_node(dma_dev->fwnode);
enum dev_dma_attr attr = acpi_get_dma_attr(adev);
if (attr == DEV_DMA_NOT_SUPPORTED)
dev_warn(dev, "DMA not supported.\n");
else
arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, 0, NULL,
attr == DEV_DMA_COHERENT);
}
if (bridge)
pci_put_host_bridge_device(bridge);
return 0;
}
---8<---
I have a feeling I was having a go at tidying up the "PCI hacks" from v4
myself, but other things ended up taking precedence.Sure, i will repost with borrowing the names. Regards, Sricharan