[Patch v4 2/2] firmware: qcom: scm: Fix interrupted SCM calls
From: Olof Johansson <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-30 01:25:29
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
Hi, On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Andy Gross [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This patch adds a Qualcomm specific quirk to the arm_smccc_smc call. On Qualcomm ARM64 platforms, the SMC call can return before it has completed. If this occurs, the call can be restarted, but it requires using the returned session ID value from the interrupted SMC call. The quirk stores off the session ID from the interrupted call in the quirk structure so that it can be used by the caller. This patch folds in a fix given by Sricharan R: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/28/272 Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <redacted> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <redacted> --- arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S | 9 ++++++++- drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 13 ++++++++++--- include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 11 ++++++++--- 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S index 6290696..72ecdca 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ * */ #include <linux/linkage.h> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h> #include <asm/asm-offsets.h> .macro SMCCC instr@@ -20,7 +21,13 @@ ldr x4, [sp] stp x0, x1, [x4, #ARM_SMCCC_RES_X0_OFFS] stp x2, x3, [x4, #ARM_SMCCC_RES_X2_OFFS] - ret + ldr x4, [sp, #8] + cbz x4, 1f /* no quirk structure */ + ldr x9, [x4, #ARM_SMCCC_QUIRK_ID_OFFS] + cmp x9, #ARM_SMCCC_QUIRK_QCOM_A6 + b.ne 1f + str x6, [x4, ARM_SMCCC_QUIRK_STATE_OFFS] +1: ret .cfi_endproc .endm
This extends the SMC entry/return path quite a bit. Is this truly a qualcomm-only quirk, or are other vendors also picking it up? Why not either make arm_smccc_.* function pointers and update them accordingly, or use a custom version for the specific locations where you want/need to restart the calls? You are after all already wrapping them in qcom_scm_call(). Seems like a more appropriate change than burden all platforms with longer code path due to your quirk. -Olof