Hi Mark,
On 19 January 2017 at 19:16, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:32:55PM +0800, Fu Wei wrote:
quoted
On 19 January 2017 at 17:11, Hanjun Guo [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 2017/1/18 21:25, fu.wei at linaro.org wrote:
quoted
From: Fu Wei <redacted>
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ else if (!gtdt->platform_timer_count)
+ pr_debug("No Platform Timer.\n");
+ else
+ timer_count = gtdt->platform_timer_count;
+
+ if (timer_count) {
+ platform_timer = (void *)gtdt +
gtdt->platform_timer_offset;
+ if (platform_timer < (void *)table +
+ sizeof(struct acpi_table_gtdt)) {
+ pr_err(FW_BUG "invalid timer data.\n");
It's ok but I didn't see other ACPI tables parsing did this check,
maybe we can just remove it :)
here, I want to make sure the FW is valid.
Once there is a FW bug, we could just return with error. :-)
Yes, please keep the check!
Yes, we will keep this check :-)
Thanks!
If anything, it would be nicer for the other ACPI code to verify things
a little more stringently.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
Best regards,
Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat