Hi Hans,

The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have 
any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge
the source code and dt-binding first?

Best Regards,
Rick

On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 17:43 +0800, Rick Chang wrote:

On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 09:54 +0800, Rick Chang wrote:

quoted

Hi Hans,

On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 13:43 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:

quoted

On 22/11/16 04:21, Rick Chang wrote:

quoted

Hi Hans,

On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:

quoted

On 17/11/16 04:38, Rick Chang wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Rick Chang <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@mediatek.com>
---
This patch depends on:
  CCF "Add clock support for Mediatek MT2701"[1]
  iommu and smi "Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701"[2]

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-October/007271.html
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9164013/

I assume that 1 & 2 will appear in 4.10? So this patch needs to go in
after the
other two are merged in 4.10?

Regards,

	Hans

[1] will appear in 4.10, but [2] will appear latter than 4.10.So this
patch needs to go in after [1] & [2] will be merged in 4.11.

So what should I do? Merge the driver for 4.11 and wait with this patch
until [2] is merged in 4.11? Does that sound reasonable?

Regards,

	Hans

What do you think about this? You merge the driver first and I send this
patch again after [1] & [2] is merged.

BTW, to prevent merging conflict, the dtsi should be merged by mediatek
SoC maintainer, Matthias.I think we can only take care on the driver
part at this moment.