Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 3 authors, 2017-02-01
STALE3433d

[PATCH v8 01/16] FDT: introduce global phandle allocation

From: andre.przywara@arm.com (Andre Przywara)
Date: 2016-12-19 18:43:58
Also in: kvm, kvmarm

Hi Marc,

On 09/12/16 12:03, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 04/11/16 17:31, Andre Przywara wrote:
quoted
Allocating an FDT phandle (a unique identifier) using a static
variable in a static inline function defined in a header file works
only if all users are in the same source file. So trying to allocate
a handle from two different compilation units fails.
Introduce global phandle allocation and reference code to properly
allocate unique phandles.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
 Makefile          |  1 +
 arm/fdt.c         |  2 +-
 arm/gic.c         |  2 +-
 include/kvm/fdt.h | 10 +++++-----
 kvm-fdt.c         | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 kvm-fdt.c
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 1f0196f..e4a4002 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ OBJS	+= kvm-ipc.o
 OBJS	+= builtin-sandbox.o
 OBJS	+= virtio/mmio.o
 OBJS	+= hw/i8042.o
+OBJS	+= kvm-fdt.o
 
 # Translate uname -m into ARCH string
 ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m | sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e s/ppc.*/powerpc/ \
diff --git a/arm/fdt.c b/arm/fdt.c
index 381d48f..8bcfffb 100644
--- a/arm/fdt.c
+++ b/arm/fdt.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int setup_fdt(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct device_header *dev_hdr;
 	u8 staging_fdt[FDT_MAX_SIZE];
-	u32 gic_phandle		= fdt__alloc_phandle();
+	u32 gic_phandle		= fdt__get_phandle(PHANDLE_GIC);
 	u64 mem_reg_prop[]	= {
 		cpu_to_fdt64(kvm->arch.memory_guest_start),
 		cpu_to_fdt64(kvm->ram_size),
diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
index d6d6dd0..b60437e 100644
--- a/arm/gic.c
+++ b/arm/gic.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ void gic__generate_fdt_nodes(void *fdt, u32 phandle, enum irqchip_type type)
 	_FDT(fdt_property_cell(fdt, "#interrupt-cells", GIC_FDT_IRQ_NUM_CELLS));
 	_FDT(fdt_property(fdt, "interrupt-controller", NULL, 0));
 	_FDT(fdt_property(fdt, "reg", reg_prop, sizeof(reg_prop)));
-	_FDT(fdt_property_cell(fdt, "phandle", phandle));
+	_FDT(fdt_property_cell(fdt, "phandle", fdt__get_phandle(PHANDLE_GIC)));
 	_FDT(fdt_end_node(fdt));
 }
 
diff --git a/include/kvm/fdt.h b/include/kvm/fdt.h
index 53d85a4..cd2bb72 100644
--- a/include/kvm/fdt.h
+++ b/include/kvm/fdt.h
@@ -8,6 +8,10 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
 #define FDT_MAX_SIZE	0x10000
+#define FDT_INVALID_PHANDLE 0
+#define FDT_IS_VALID_PHANDLE(phandle) ((phandle) != FDT_INVALID_PHANDLE)
+
+enum phandles {PHANDLE_GIC, PHANDLES_MAX};
Another nit here: PHANDLE_GIC is pretty much ARM-specific, while FDT is
supposed to be generic. Can't we move the enum to be architecture
specific and not put this in an architecture agnostic one?
Yes, that indeed makes sense.
This requires an include file for every architecture, but well ...

Cheers,
Andre.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help