Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 2 authors, 2016-12-09

[PATCH v3 0/4] mm: fix the "counter.sh" failure for libhugetlbfs

From: Huang Shijie <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-09 09:58:29
Also in: linux-mm

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:52:54AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 08-12-16 17:36:24, Huang Shijie wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:02:38PM +0800, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
I haven't yet checked your patchset but I can tell you one thing.
Could you please review the patch set when you have time? Thanks a lot.
From a quick glance you do not handle the reservation code at all. You
Thanks, I will study the code again, and try to find What we need to do
with the reservation code.
just make sure that the allocation doesn't fail unconditionally. I might
be wrong here and Naoya resp. Mike will know much better but this seems
far from enough to me.

Well, this would take me quite some time and basically restudy the whole
hugetlb code again. What you are trying to achieve is not a simple "fix
a test case" thing. You are trying to implement full featured giga pages
suport. And as I've said this requires a deeper understanding of the
current code and clean it up considerably wrt. giga pages. This is
definitely desirable plan longterm and I would like to encourage you for
that but it is not a simple project at the same time. 
Okay, I will try to implement the full featured giga pages support. :)

But I feel confused at the "full featured". If the patch set can pass
all the giga pages tests in the libhugetlbfs, can we say it is "full
featured"? Or some one reviews this patch set, and say it is full
featured support for the giga pages.

Thanks
Huang Shijie
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help