[PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature
From: Suman Anna <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-23 23:58:30
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-remoteproc, lkml
On 12/23/2016 11:05 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
Hi Sarang,quoted
quoted
On 12/15/2016 06:03 PM, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:quoted
The function wkup_m3_rproc_boot_thread waits for asynchronous firmware loading to complete successfully before calling rproc_boot(). The same can be achieved by just setting rproc->auto_boot flag. Change this. As a result this change removes wkup_m3_rproc_boot_thread and moves m3_ipc->sync_complete initialization to the wkup_m3_ipc_probe(). Other than the current usage, the firmware_loading_complete is only used in rproc_del() where it's no longer needed. This change is in preparation for removing firmware_loading_complete completely.Based on the comments so far, I am assuming that you are dropping this series.No, may not be dropping this. Will try to handle it differently in rproc_del() (probably by making use of some state flag).quoted
In any case, this series did break our PM stack. We definitely don't want to auto-boot the wkup_m3_rproc device, that responsibility will need to stay with the wkup_m3_ipc driver.Which scenario did it break? Booting up rproc device before wkup_m3_ipc_probe() causes issues?Yes, our state machine requires the wkup_m3_ipc driver to control the boot of the wkup_m3 remoteproc. The wkup_m3 is not a typical remoteproc, it is our PM master and is responsible for putting the host processor into suspend and waking it up in system suspend/cpuidle paths. The remoteproc infrastructure is only used for load/boot, but the Linux PM state machine and communication is all controlled by the wkup_m3_ipc driver.quoted
Nevertheless, I think Bjorn's suggestion of just dropping the call to wait_for_completion() and keeping kthread looks good, also because of the fact that rproc_boot() anyways calls request_firmware() and no longer needed to wait on asynchronous loading of firmware.Yeah, I will have to test this, but looking at current code, this should mostly be ok because of the remoteproc core changes w.r.t resource table parsing.
Tested with just the wait_for_completion() removed and it works fine. I can send a patch for the same if you prefer me to send it. regards Suman
regards Suman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html