[RESEND PATCH 2/2] arm64: make WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE depends on HUGETLB_PAGE
flat view
From: zhong jiang <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-16 13:00:28
Also in:
lkml
On 2016/12/16 20:35, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:10:05PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:quoted
On 2016/12/14 22:19, zhongjiang wrote:quoted
From: zhong jiang <redacted> when HUGETLB_PAGE is disable, WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE contains the fuctions should not be use. therefore, we add the dependency. Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <redacted> --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 969ef88..694ca73 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig@@ -640,6 +640,7 @@ config SYS_SUPPORTS_HUGETLBFS config ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE def_bool y if ARM64_4K_PAGES || (ARM64_16K_PAGES && !ARM64_VA_BITS_36) + depends on HUGETLB_PAGE config ARCH_HAS_CACHE_LINE_SIZE def_bool yHi, I still think it is a issue. Perhaps above changelog is unclear. Further explain is as follows. when hugetlb_pages is disable and arch_want_huge_pmd_share is enable, we maybe call huge_pmd_sahre in hugetlbpage.c, but the function actually is not definition as it is not exported. is it right ??The only users of ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE on arm64 are: arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c: if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE) &&
yes
mm/hugetlb.c:#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE mm/hugetlb.c:#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE */ mm/hugetlb.c:#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE */ and neither of those files are compiled if !HUGETLB_PAGE.
Indeed, but The only users maybe use it if !HUGETLB_PAGE. because include/linux/hugetlb.h can not export the reference if !HUGETLB_PAGE. IOW, the function is not definition. is it right ? or I miss the key point.
Are you actually seeing a problem here?
I review the code and find the issue. Thanks zhongjiang
Will .