[PATCH 16/16] drivers/fsi: Add GPIO based FSI master
From: jk@ozlabs.org (Jeremy Kerr)
Date: 2016-12-09 04:12:10
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Chris,
+static ssize_t store_scan(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf,
+ size_t count)
+{
+ struct fsi_master_gpio *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ fsi_master_gpio_init(master);
+
+ /* clear out any old scan data if present */
+ fsi_master_unregister(&master->master);
+ fsi_master_register(&master->master);
+
+ return count;
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR(scan, 0200, NULL, store_scan);I think it would make more sense to have the scan attribute populated by the fsi core; we want this on all masters, not just GPIO. Currently, the only GPIO-master-specific functionality here is the fsi_master_gpio_init() - but isn't this something that we can do at probe time instead?
+static int fsi_master_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct fsi_master_gpio *master;
+ struct gpio_desc *gpio;
+
+ master = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*master), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!master)
+ return -ENOMEM;We should be populating master->dev.parent, see https://github.com/jk-ozlabs/linux/commit/5225d6c47
+ /* Optional pins */ + + gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "trans", 0); + if (IS_ERR(gpio)) + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "probe: failed to get trans pin\n"); + else + master->gpio_trans = gpio;
I found devm_gpiod_get_optional(), which might make this a little neater. Cheers, Jeremy