Thread (59 messages) 59 messages, 8 authors, 2017-01-09

[PATCH 16/18] arm64: ptrace: handle ptrace_request differently for aarch32 and ilp32

From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2016-12-07 16:59:30
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:55:08AM +0530, Yury Norov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:34:23PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:33:15PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
quoted
New aarch32 ptrace syscall handler is introduced to avoid run-time
detection of the task type.
What's wrong with the run-time detection? If it's just to avoid a
negligible overhead, I would rather keep the code simpler by avoiding
duplicating the generic compat_sys_ptrace().
Nothing wrong. This is how Arnd asked me to do. You already asked this
question: http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1604.3/00930.html
Hmm, I completely forgot about this ;). There is still an advantage to
doing run-time checking if we avoid touching core code (less acks to
gather and less code duplication).

Let's see what Arnd says but the initial patch looked simpler.

-- 
Catalin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help