Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 3 authors, 2016-12-07

[PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: da850: fix infinite loop in clk_set_rate()

From: david@lechnology.com (David Lechner)
Date: 2016-12-07 01:54:55
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

On 12/05/2016 04:09 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
The aemif clock is added twice to the lookup table in da850.c. This
breaks the children list of pll0_sysclk3 as we're using the same list
links in struct clk. When calling clk_set_rate(), we get stuck in
propagate_rate().
&emac_clk is used twice in this list as well. Shouldn't we fix it too? I 
would expect that it causes the same problem.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Create a separate clock for nand, inheriting the rate of the aemif
clock and retrieve it in the davinci_nand module.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
index e770c97..c008e5e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
@@ -367,6 +367,11 @@ static struct clk aemif_clk = {
 	.flags		= ALWAYS_ENABLED,
 };

+static struct clk aemif_nand_clk = {
+	.name		= "nand",
+	.parent		= &aemif_clk,
+};
+
 static struct clk usb11_clk = {
 	.name		= "usb11",
 	.parent		= &pll0_sysclk4,
@@ -537,7 +542,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup da850_clks[] = {
 	CLK("da830-mmc.0",	NULL,		&mmcsd0_clk),
 	CLK("da830-mmc.1",	NULL,		&mmcsd1_clk),
 	CLK("ti-aemif",		NULL,		&aemif_clk),
-	CLK(NULL,		"aemif",	&aemif_clk),
+	CLK(NULL,		"aemif",	&aemif_nand_clk),
 	CLK("ohci-da8xx",	"usb11",	&usb11_clk),
 	CLK("musb-da8xx",	"usb20",	&usb20_clk),
 	CLK("spi_davinci.0",	NULL,		&spi0_clk),
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help