On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 05:05:49PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:56:15AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:

quoted

I can easily make the changes Robin suggests above, I need to know
what to do with this patch it is the last blocking point for this
series and time is running out I can revert to using dev->bus to
retrieve iommu_ops (even though I do not think it makes sense given
what Robin outlines below) but I need to know please, we can't gate
an entire series for this patch that is just syntactic sugar.

Well, I didn't really object to the approach per-se, I just wanted to
know the rationale behind the need for the iommu-ops pointer. So through
which tree should this series be merged?

I was just about to send a pull request to you, since it conflicts with
my ARM SMMU patches and the PCI/ACPI bits are acked by Rafael and Bjorn.

My for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates is ready to go; just need to write the
pull request.

Will