On 11/22/2016 02:20 AM, Y.T. Tang wrote:

Hi Scott,

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Wood [mailto:oss at buserror.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 2:54 PM
To: Y.T. Tang <redacted>; mturquette at baylibre.com
Cc: sboyd at codeaurora.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Scott Wood
[off-list ref]; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
kernel at lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qoriq: added ls1012a clock configuration

On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 13:58 +0800, yuantian.tang at nxp.com wrote:

quoted

From: Tang Yuantian <redacted>

Added ls1012a clock configuation information.

Do we really need the same line in the changelog twice?

quoted

Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <redacted>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c b/drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c index

1bece0f..563d874 100644

--- a/drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c

@@ -202,6 +202,14 @@ static const struct clockgen_muxinfo ls1021a_cmux

= {

quoted

 	}
 };

+static const struct clockgen_muxinfo ls1012a_cmux = {
+	{
+		[0] = { CLKSEL_VALID, CGA_PLL1, PLL_DIV1 },
+		{},
+		[2] = { CLKSEL_VALID, CGA_PLL1, PLL_DIV2 },
+	}
+};
+

Based on the "ls1021a_cmux" in the context it looks like this patch is
intended to apply on top
of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8923541/ but I don't see any mention
of that.

I saw this patch had been merged already.

Regards,
Yuantian

I don't see it in linux-next.

-Scott