[v16, 0/7] Fix eSDHC host version register bug

Hi Ulf,

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:

On 9 November 2016 at 04:14, Yangbo Lu [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This patchset is used to fix a host version register bug in the T4240-R1.0-R2.0
eSDHC controller. To match the SoC version and revision, 15 previous version
patchsets had tried many methods but all of them were rejected by reviewers.
Such as
        - dts compatible method
        - syscon method
        - ifdef PPC method
        - GUTS driver getting SVR method
Anrd suggested a soc_device_match method in v10, and this is the only available
method left now. This v11 patchset introduces the soc_device_match interface in
soc driver.

The first four patches of Yangbo are to add the GUTS driver. This is used to
register a soc device which contain soc version and revision information.
The other three patches introduce the soc_device_match method in soc driver
and apply it on esdhc driver to fix this bug.

---
Changes for v15:
        - Dropped patch 'dt: bindings: update Freescale DCFG compatible'
          since the work had been done by below patch on ShawnGuo's linux tree.
          'dt-bindings: fsl: add LS1043A/LS1046A/LS2080A compatible for SCFG
           and DCFG'
        - Fixed error code issue in guts driver
Changes for v16:
        - Dropped patch 'powerpc/fsl: move mpc85xx.h to include/linux/fsl'
        - Added a bug-fix patch from Geert
---

Arnd Bergmann (1):
  base: soc: introduce soc_device_match() interface

Geert Uytterhoeven (1):
  base: soc: Check for NULL SoC device attributes

Thanks, applied on my mmc tree for next!

Oops, the above two commits (plus two more enhancements) are also a dependency
for Samsung and Renesas. Hence the plan was to use an immutable branch for
that...

Ulf, would it still be possible to replace these two commits in mmc/next:

    8b82c17a8ae533d6 base: soc: introduce soc_device_match() interface
    6fa350172b098f0f base: soc: Check for NULL SoC device attributes

by a merge of the immutable branch I've just created?
Cfr, the other thread  "[PATCH v2 0/7] soc: renesas: Identify SoC and register
with the SoC bus".

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds