Hi Catalin,

On 30/10/16 14:22, Catalin Marinas wrote:

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:

quoted

I'm thus now assuming that everybody is OK with the patches and that they can
be queued for 4.10 (we certainly need this plumbing at this point). Please
speak if my assumption is wrong (and provide feedback! :).
Otherwise I'm going to:

 - use Russell's patching system for patches 2 and 8
 - ask Sudeep to pull patches 3,5,6 and 7
 - ask Catalin/Will to pull patches 1,4 and 9

I'm happy to queue patches 1, 4 and 9 for 4.10 (though it might have
been easier for the whole series to go through arm-soc).

quoted

Do you think we might get into trouble splitting the merge process this way?

Probably not. The only minor downside is that I have to grab a new DT
for Juno from Sudeep to test the patches. Not an issue, though.

Thanks and apologies if merging through different trees generates some
confusion.

I updated arm patches to address Russell's comments. I did the same for
arm64. I'll reply with the updated version, so you can see if it looks
good to you as well. In case it is OK, I already updated the for-arm64
branch with the new version:
 
 git://linux-arm.org/linux-jl.git upstream/default_caps_for-arm64 

Best,

- Juri