On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Lina Iyer [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Oct 21 2016 at 16:48 -0600, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Lina Iyer [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Oct 17 2016 at 01:30 -0600, Ulf Hansson wrote:

quoted

On 14 October 2016 at 19:47, Lina Iyer [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi all,

Changes since v2 [3] -
- Addressed review comments from v2.
        - domain-idle-states documentation updated
        - fixed compiler issues with imx driver
        - minor code change in pm_domains.c
- The series is available at [4].

Changes since v1 [2] -
- Addressed review comments from v1.
        - Fixes around dynamic allocation of genpd states
        - Used OF method for iterating phandles
        - Updated documentation, examples
        - Rename state variable (provider -> fwnode)
- The series is available at [3].

The changes from [1] are -
- Allocating memory for domain idle states dynamically
- Conform to naming conventions for internal and exported genpd
functions
- DT binding example for domain-idle-state
- Use fwnode instead of of_node
- Handle atomic case for removal of PM Domain
- Rebase on top of Rafael's pm/genpd tree

Thanks,
Lina

Lina Iyer (8):
  PM / Domains: Make genpd state allocation dynamic
  PM / Domain: Add residency property to genpd states
  PM / Domains: Allow domain power states to be read from DT
  PM / Domains: Save the fwnode in genpd_power_state
  dt/bindings: Update binding for PM domain idle states
  PM / Domains: Abstract genpd locking
  PM / Domains: Support IRQ safe PM domains
  PM / doc: Update device documentation for devices in IRQ safe PM
    domains

 .../devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt     |  43 +++
 Documentation/power/devices.txt                    |   9 +-
 arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c                            |  17 +-
 drivers/base/power/domain.c                        | 358
+++++++++++++++++----
 include/linux/pm_domain.h                          |  28 +-
 5 files changed, 383 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

Rafael, Lina,

This looks good to me! Unless any other objections, I suggest to apply
this to get it tested in linux-next.

Kind regards
Uffe

Rafael,

If there are no objections, could you pick this patch for linux-next?

It is in my queue, but not at the top yet.

Thank you Rafael.

OK, I'm queuing up patches [1-7/8] as I don't see anything
particularly objectionable in them.

The documentation one needs some more work, however, and I've sent
comments on that one already.

Thanks,
Rafael