[PATCH V3 8/8] arm64: dma-mapping: Remove the notifier trick to handle early setting of dma_ops
From: Sricharan <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-07 15:40:20
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu
Subsystem:
iommu subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Joerg Roedel, Will Deacon, Linus Torvalds
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-10-27 · RE: [PATCH V3 8/8] arm64: dma-mapping: Remove the notifier trick to handle early setting of dma_ops · Sricharan <hidden>
- 2016-10-26 · Re: [PATCH V3 8/8] arm64: dma-mapping: Remove the notifier trick to handle early setting of dma_ops · Robin Murphy <hidden>
- 2016-10-04 · [PATCH V3 8/8] arm64: dma-mapping: Remove the notifier trick to handle early setting of dma_ops · Sricharan R <hidden>
Hi,
quoted hunk
-----Original Message----- From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Sricharan R Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 10:34 PM To: will.deacon at arm.com; robin.murphy at arm.com; joro at 8bytes.org; iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-arm- kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org; laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com; m.szyprowski at samsung.com; tfiga at chromium.org; srinivas.kandagatla at linaro.org Cc: sricharan at codeaurora.org Subject: [PATCH V3 8/8] arm64: dma-mapping: Remove the notifier trick to handle early setting of dma_ops With arch_setup_dma_ops now being called late during device's probe after the device's iommu is probed, the notifier trick required to handle the early setup of dma_ops before the iommu group gets created is not required. So removing the notifier's here. Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <redacted> --- arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 100 ++------------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c index faf4b92..eb593af 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c@@ -799,24 +799,6 @@ static struct dma_map_ops iommu_dma_ops = {.mapping_error = iommu_dma_mapping_error, }; -/* - * TODO: Right now __iommu_setup_dma_ops() gets called too early to do - * everything it needs to - the device is only partially created and the - * IOMMU driver hasn't seen it yet, so it can't have a group. Thus we - * need this delayed attachment dance. Once IOMMU probe ordering is sorted - * to move the arch_setup_dma_ops() call later, all the notifier bits below - * become unnecessary, and will go away. - */ -struct iommu_dma_notifier_data { - struct list_head list; - struct device *dev; - const struct iommu_ops *ops; - u64 dma_base; - u64 size; -}; -static LIST_HEAD(iommu_dma_masters); -static DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_dma_notifier_lock); - static bool do_iommu_attach(struct device *dev, const struct iommu_ops *ops, u64 dma_base, u64 size) {@@ -837,79 +819,9 @@ static bool do_iommu_attach(struct device *dev, const struct iommu_ops *ops,return true; } -static void queue_iommu_attach(struct device *dev, const struct iommu_ops *ops, - u64 dma_base, u64 size) -{ - struct iommu_dma_notifier_data *iommudata; - - iommudata = kzalloc(sizeof(*iommudata), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!iommudata) - return; - - iommudata->dev = dev; - iommudata->ops = ops; - iommudata->dma_base = dma_base; - iommudata->size = size; - - mutex_lock(&iommu_dma_notifier_lock); - list_add(&iommudata->list, &iommu_dma_masters); - mutex_unlock(&iommu_dma_notifier_lock); -} - -static int __iommu_attach_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, - unsigned long action, void *data) -{ - struct iommu_dma_notifier_data *master, *tmp; - - if (action != BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER) - return 0; - - mutex_lock(&iommu_dma_notifier_lock); - list_for_each_entry_safe(master, tmp, &iommu_dma_masters, list) { - if (data == master->dev && do_iommu_attach(master->dev, - master->ops, master->dma_base, master->size)) { - list_del(&master->list); - kfree(master); - break; - } - } - mutex_unlock(&iommu_dma_notifier_lock); - return 0; -} - -static int __init register_iommu_dma_ops_notifier(struct bus_type *bus) -{ - struct notifier_block *nb = kzalloc(sizeof(*nb), GFP_KERNEL); - int ret; - - if (!nb) - return -ENOMEM; - - nb->notifier_call = __iommu_attach_notifier; - - ret = bus_register_notifier(bus, nb); - if (ret) { - pr_warn("Failed to register DMA domain notifier; IOMMU DMA ops unavailable on bus '%s'\n", - bus->name); - kfree(nb); - } - return ret; -} - static int __init __iommu_dma_init(void) { - int ret; - - ret = iommu_dma_init(); - if (!ret) - ret = register_iommu_dma_ops_notifier(&platform_bus_type); - if (!ret) - ret = register_iommu_dma_ops_notifier(&amba_bustype); -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI - if (!ret) - ret = register_iommu_dma_ops_notifier(&pci_bus_type); -#endif - return ret; + return iommu_dma_init(); } arch_initcall(__iommu_dma_init);@@ -920,18 +832,12 @@ static void __iommu_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,if (!ops) return; - /* - * TODO: As a concession to the future, we're ready to handle being - * called both early and late (i.e. after bus_add_device). Once all - * the platform bus code is reworked to call us late and the notifier - * junk above goes away, move the body of do_iommu_attach here. - */ + group = iommu_group_get(dev); + if (group) { do_iommu_attach(dev, ops, dma_base, size); iommu_group_put(group); - } else { - queue_iommu_attach(dev, ops, dma_base, size); } }
I should have has this as well for being removed, From: Sricharan R <redacted> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 19:20:21 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] iommu:/arm-smmu: Avoid early iommu device registration of_platform_device_create was called early in the init to have the smmu probed before the master. But now with the probe deferral, this is not needed. Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <redacted> --- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index c841eb7..083489e4 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c@@ -2066,9 +2066,6 @@ static int __init arm_smmu_of_init(struct device_node *np) if (ret) return ret; - if (!of_platform_device_create(np, NULL, platform_bus_type.dev_root)) - return -ENODEV; - return 0; } IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv1, "arm,smmu-v1", arm_smmu_of_init);
--
1.8.2.1
Regards,
Sricharan