On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:20:29AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm-boards
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm-boards
@@ -148,15 +148,14 @@ Example:
/dts-v1/;
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
-#include "skeleton.dtsi"
/ {
model = "ARM RealView PB1176 with device tree";
compatible = "arm,realview-pb1176";
+ #address-cells = <0>;
How did I manage to turn the <1> into a <0> by moving and reindenting
two lines?!? Will fix, too.
quoted
quoted
+ #size-cells = <1>;
soc {
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <1>;
Strictly speaking, these two are still necessary for the ranges
property. They're *not* inherited per the spec, no matter what Linux
happens to do today.
I wasn't sure about that part of the change. OK, will fix.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds