[PATCH v3 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support
From: Jan Glauber <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-28 17:10:50
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 04:17:49PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 01:23:51PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote:quoted
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:37:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:quoted
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:30:36AM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote:quoted
Note: I'm using perf_sw_context in difference to perf_invalid_context (see WARN_ON in perf_pmu_register). Reason is that with perf_invalid_context add() is never called and the counter results are shown as "unsupported" by perf. With perf_sw_context everything works as expected.What?! All the uncore PMUs use perf_invalid_context. What doesn't work for you?OK, so using perf_invalid_context and "-a" seems to work. But I must say that I hate that from a user perspective. The user needs to know about the type of PMU behind the event and then provide "-a" or get a "<not supported" as counter value?Sure, but in the interest of getting *something* merged, can we start off using perf_invalid_context and then have the discussion about whether or not this can be extended later on, please? If your PMU is a shared resource amongst CPUs, it maybe that all you want is a better error message from the perf tool (but again, this can come later!).
If that is the only obstacle I can repost with perf_sw_context (or do a follow-up patch). After all it works, it is just "clueless" people like me that are not aware of the required switches. --Jan
Will