[PATCH V2 00/10] PM / Domains: Add support for removing PM domains
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-14 00:58:34
Also in:
linux-pm, linux-tegra
On Monday, September 12, 2016 12:01:04 PM Jon Hunter wrote:
In order to safely remove PM domains there are a few changes that need to be made to ensure that no one is holding an external reference to a PM domain after it has been removed. One solution, implemented here, solves this by eliminating external references to PM domain. Changes from V1: - Added test when removing a PM domain to ensure the PM domain provider has been removed. - Re-organised patches 8-10 so that patch #8 adds the code to verify if the provider is present, patch #9 adds basic support for removing PM domains and patch #10 adds support for removing PM domains by provider. Changes from initial RFC: - Renamed functions made static per Ulf's feedback. - Added patch to clean-up provider/xlate APIs per Ulf's feedback - Re-worked and simplified the association between PM domains and PM domain providers. Dropped the 'provider_data' variable from the generic_pm_domain structure in favour of using the fwnode_handle. - Split patch for removing PM domains into multiple patches per Ulf's feedback. Jon Hunter (10): PM / Domains: Add new helper functions for device-tree ARM: EXYNOS: Remove calls to of_genpd_get_from_provider() staging: board: Remove calls to of_genpd_get_from_provider() PM / Domains: Don't expose generic_pm_domain structure to clients PM / Domains: Don't expose xlate and provider helper functions PM / Domains: Verify the PM domain is present when adding a provider PM / Domains: Prepare for adding support to remove PM domains PM / Domains: Store the provider in the PM domain structure PM / Domains: Add support for removing PM domains PM / Domains: Add support for removing nested PM domains by provider
All applied. I'll expose a branch containing them after they've spent a couple of days in linux-next. Thanks, Rafael